Skip To Main Content

ESG Exclusions: Setting Expectations

Values-Aligned Investing
November 12, 2018

Investors often ask us about the expected impact of certain socially responsible (SRI/ESG) constraints on the risk and performance of a portfolio. In our earlier work, we explored several different approaches for constructing a custom SRI/ESG portfolio to help frame that discussion. Here we take a closer look at short- and long-horizon impacts of a popular industry exclusion when using an optimizer to construct portfolios.

Aperio's investment process seeks to create a diversified equity portfolio that looks and behaves like its benchmark while still respecting SRI/ESG objectives. As a result, portfolios that exclude a specific industry will tend to redeploy that capital in other industries whose fundamental and economic risks are similar to the divested industry’s.

In our earlier work, we referred to this approach as the “Optimized Exclusion” strategy in order to contrast it clearly with a naïve reweighting approach (“Cap-Weighted Exclusion”). The latter approach is simple: it does not require a risk model nor an optimizer. While we expect this approach to outperform if the excluded securities underperform, it also may lead to excessive forecast tracking error.

In contrast, we expect our optimized approach to “cushion” the negative performance impact that could occur when an industry that has been excluded outperforms. However, because other industries are not perfect substitutes for the excluded industry, we expect the customized portfolio to have some amount of variation around the benchmark’s performance. We use forecast  tracking error as the primary gauge of how much a portfolio’s performance could vary from its benchmark.

For example, investors who excluded the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels (OGCF) industry generally experienced underperformance relative to standard (market-capitalization weighted) benchmarks such as the MSCI ACWI in Q2 2018. To illustrate this, we simulated the historical performance of a nontaxable portfolio with an OGCF exclusion.

cumulative active return

If we look at the next quarter’s performance (Q3 2018), we see that the situation has reversed and the custom portfolio outperformed its benchmark, erasing all of the underperformance in Q2.

A quarter is a very short time period to evaluate the performance of a strategy. (Research* has shown that checking performance too often increases the likelihood of making suboptimal investment decisions.) So we examined the performance of the same custom portfolio as far back as 2008. The following chart shows the correlation of the active returns of the custom portfolio against the active returns of the OGCF industry.

correlation of active returns

While there is a fluctuation in the magnitude of the historical correlation, it is pretty clear that a portfolio that excludes the OGCF industry will generally  underperform when the OGCF industry  outperforms (the correlation is generally negative).

Aperio’s approach to portfolio construction tries to minimize the impact on performance (relative to a benchmark) from an exclusion, but it cannot completely eliminate it as a driver of risk and return. This is reflected in summary risk statistics such as forecast tracking error, which provides a general guide for the expected magnitude of deviation around a benchmark but does not indicate whether the potential deviations will be positive or negative.

Send questions or comments to

*“The Effect of Myopia and Loss Aversion on Risk Taking: An Experimental Test”; “Myopic Loss Aversion and the Equity Premium Puzzle.”

This material is not intended to be relied upon as a forecast, research or investment advice, and is not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities or to adopt any investment strategy. The opinions expressed are as of the date of publication and may change as subsequent conditions vary. The information and opinions contained in this post are derived from proprietary and non-proprietary sources deemed by BlackRock [Aperio] to be reliable, are not necessarily all-inclusive and are not guaranteed as to accuracy. As such, no warranty of accuracy or reliability is given and no responsibility arising in any other way for errors and omissions (including responsibility to any person by reason of negligence) is accepted by BlackRock, its officers, employees or agents. This post may contain “forward-looking” information that is not purely historical in nature. Such information may include, among other things, projections and forecasts. There is no guarantee that any forecasts made will come to pass. Reliance upon information in this post is at the sole discretion of the reader.

©2021 BlackRock, Inc. All rights reserved. BLACKROCK is a registered trademark of BlackRock, Inc., or its subsidiaries in the United States or elsewhere. All other marks are the property of their respective owners.